President Muhammadu Buhari's alleged favouritism for the north has been exposed as documents showed northern states got the lion share of World Bank projects.
President Muhammadu Buhari
Contrary to President Muhammadu Buhari’s claim on Friday that his discussion with the President of the World Bank Group, Jim Yong Kim,
was twisted, a huge chunk of the financial institution-backed projects
in partnership with the Federal Government is based in the North, a report by Punch has revealed.
President Buhari who has always been accused by his critics of
favouring the northern part of the country, citing lopsidedness in
various appointments made by his administration has been caught again as
shown by available documents.
Findings by Punch on Saturday on the World Bank website,
projects.worldbank.org, showed that out of the 14 World Bank-sponsored
projects in the country, seven are exclusively for the North, while six
others are meant for the whole nation (South-West, South-South,
South-East, North-West, North-East, North Central and North West); and
the remaining one is for Lagos State. Titled ‘Projects and Operations’,
these projects were listed under June 2015 – June 2017 projects.
The implication is that in addition to solely getting the lion’s
share of the projects, the North also shared in the remaining 50 per
cent with the South-West, South-East and South-South.
The projects exclusive to the northern region worth $1bn are:
Multi-Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project for North-eastern Nigeria ($200m;
Borno, Yobe and Adamawa); State Education Program Investment Project
($100m; North-East states); Community and Social Development Project
($75m; Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Bauchi, and Gombe); Youth
Employment and Social Support Project ($100m; Borno, Yobe, Adamawa,
Taraba, Bauchi, and Gombe States); Additional Financing Nigeria State
Health Investment Project ($125m; Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba and Yobe)
and the Third National Fadama Development Project ($50m; selected area
in the North-East). The seventh northern project worth $350m is for the
Kaduna State Economic Transformation Program-for-Results Project $350m.
The KSETPRP, which was approved in June 2017, is expected to close on
March 31, 2021.
Projects worth $2.9bn were earmarked for the nation which northern
states are also expected to benefit from. They are: Better Education
Service Delivery for All ($611m); Mineral Sector Support for Economic
Diversification Project ($150m); NEITI Reporting Compliance ($0.32m);
the Polio Eradication Support Project ($125m); National Social Safety
Nets Project ($1.8b); and $200m-Agro-Processing, Agricultural
Productivity Enhancement and Livelihood Improvement Support Project
specifically designed for Kano, Kaduna, Lagos, Cross River, Kogi, Enugu
and three other states.
There was also the Third Lagos State Development Policy Operation
($200m), a stand-alone project which was approved on June 26, 2015 and
ended on December 31, 2016.
The World Bank documents
did not contain any programme or project specifically designed for the
South-East, South-South and the Middle Belt regions since Buhari got
into power.
A document containing the details of the project on the bank’s website explained the purpose of the Kaduna project thus: “The
development objective of Kaduna State Economic Transformation
Programme-for-Results Project for Nigeria is to improve the business
enabling environment and strengthen fiscal management and accountability
in Kaduna State. This operation is fully aligned with the World Bank.
Group’s Country Partnership Strategy for the Federal Republic of Nigeria
for FY14–FY17. This Programme-for-Results focuses on increasing the
number of jobs in the modern private sector and boosting the
productivity of traditional economic sectors. Another important and
complementary focus of the PforR is to support Kaduna State to increase
its fiscal space and enhance expenditure effectiveness to boost
investments in human capital and physical assets sustainably.”
According to the bank’s documents, the $200m-MSCRP, meant for only North-East states, is to “support
the government of Nigeria towards rehabilitating and improving critical
service delivery infrastructure, improve the livelihood opportunities
of conflict and displacement-affected communities, and strengthen social
cohesion in the North-East states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa; and in
the event of an eligible crisis or emergency, to provide immediate and
effective response to the said eligible crisis or emergency.”
Similarly, the SEPIV’s objective is to finance activities to
support the Federal Government’s emergency programme for the North-East
to address teachers’ needs in conflict-and-displacement-affected areas;
strengthen school-level management and accountability for the
improvement of education quality through school grants funding; “and to enhance technical assistance to address the needs of the North-East.”
For the CSDP, the World Bank will finance the costs associated with
scaling up project activities in Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Bauchi,
and Gombe states to support the provision of basic social and natural
resource management infrastructure and services to returnees and host
communities with the main goal of assisting their resettlement,
recovery, and welfare.
The fund, the document said, would also be “used to provide
trauma and psychosocial support to returnee households and internally
displaced groups and individuals, as a form of social assistance
intervention.”
Shedding light on why half of the projects were exclusively
allocated to the North and no special projects for the other regions,
the World Bank boss at a press conference in Washington DC, United
States, on Thursday, had disclosed that the bank focused more on the
region based on Buhari’s request.
“You know, in my very first meeting with President Buhari, he
said specifically that he would like us to shift our focus to the
northern region of Nigeria and we’ve done that. Now, it has been very
difficult. The work there has been very difficult.
“Focusing on the northern part of Nigeria, we hope that as
commodity prices stabilise and oil prices come back up, the economy will
grow a bit more. But very, very much important is the need to focus on
what the drivers of growth in the future will be,” the bank’s president had said.
Weighing in on the matter through a series of tweets, a former
World Bank Vice President and ex-Minister of Education under
ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, Oby Ezekwesili, said, “I want
everyone to know that the statement made by the World Bank president is
not as it sounds. I should know; I was VP (vice president) there (the
bank). Our president and his government should seize the moment to
conduct a diversity review of the administration. The current tension
is, of course, triggered by context of existing tension occasioned by
our president’s poor management of our diversity.”
Ezekwesili, however, berated Adesina for worsening the situation,
“The terribly indecorous press release by Femi Adesina worsens a
fractious debate. This FG (Federal Government) cannot be leaders of
toxicity in public debates. Healthy debates are important for managing
our diversity. The government of President Buhari should rein in his
media team and re-train them to be effective.”
On Saturday, prominent Nigerians and the major opposition party in
the country, the Peoples Democratic Party, further expressed their views
on the matter.
Commenting on the cost of the projects, a renowned professor of
Economics, Sheriffdeen Tella, pointed out that inasmuch as the
North-East might require substantial rehabilitation, the same should be
for the Niger Delta.
“The figures show that $650m projects are specifically for the
North-East, while about $2.9bn worth of projects is for the whole of the
country, including the northern states. The ones for Kaduna and Lagos
states are state-requested loans, not federal. Just as the North-East
deserves special attention, so also is the South-South where oil
spillage has devastated many areas. There should have been specific
financial commitment for that also.
“The amount committed to the North-East is worth it if we are
to keep them from coming to the South to create social and economic
problems in the nearest future. But attention must also be paid to
specific problems of special areas in the South, more so when large
proportions of the funds to offset the loans will come from resources in
the South – particularly from the South-South with oil spillage
problem.”
According to the Peoples Democratic Party, the President’s approval of more World Bank projects for the North, as revealed by Kim, was not in the interest of the country.
Reacting to the comment, the spokesman for the major opposition
party in the country, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, said, “We’ve always said
Buhari is not acting as the president of the country. He has
demonstrated that through his lopsided appointments. That’s all we can
say.”
Similarly, a nationalist and elder statesman, Chief Ayo Adebanjo,
told SUNDAY PUNCH that Kim only confirmed what people already know about
Buhari’s preference for the North.
“Is it those he surrounds himself with? Is it about the
lopsided appointments he’s made? Buhari telling the World Bank president
that more attention should be given to the northern region shows which
section of the country matters most to the president. Buhari can never
change. He’s a sectional leader,” he said.
Speaking further, Tella noted that if what the World Bank president
claimed Buhari told him was true, such a gesture would be unfair to
other regions in the country.
“There are other parts of the country to focus on. It is not
the fault of Nigerians that the North in general is lagging behind. The
northerners should hold their state governments and political elites
responsible for any backwardness. Just as the southern states collect
money from the Federal Government, so do northern states. What have they
done with their resources?”
The Executive Chairman of the Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open
Leadership, Debo Adeniran, people should not be quick to criticise the
President.
“Let’s agree it’s nepotism and nepotism is a form of
corruption. I also believe that the common wealth of the country should
be evenly distributed. Be that as it may be, we must not trivialise
equity. It’s not out of place to allocate more projects to the
North-East because of the challenges of that area. It may not sound
fair. We want the President to defend his action. He has a
responsibility to justify it.
“You should now realise why people clamour for a rotational
presidency; give a madman a hoe, he’ll make ridges for himself. If a
president comes from the North or South, it’s expected he’ll take care
of his own first. Admittedly, this is antithetical to democracy,” Adeniran said.
No comments:
Post a Comment