Movie Review : The Devil Wears Prada 2: Glamour in Decline



Making a sequel almost twenty years after the original is a tough ask under the best circumstances, and you can feel that weight pressing down on The Devil Wears Prada 2 from its very first scene. Part of what made the original work was timing it landed at a moment when fashion magazines still ran the culture, print media still had teeth, and ambition looked glamorous even at its cruelest. This sequel wants to drag that same tension into the digital age, but the update never quite lands. Most of it plays less like a sharp new take and more like a film trying to recapture old sparks in a world that's already moved on.


The real problem is that the movie doesn't know what it wants to be. Is it a satire about legacy media falling apart? A character study about aging out of relevance? A nostalgia lap for people who loved the first one? It keeps switching lanes, and because of that, none of these ideas gets the room it needs. There are genuinely interesting threads in here corporate control, the rise of influencer culture, editorial freedom dying a slow death but the script never sticks with any of them long enough to actually say something.


Meryl Streep is back as Miranda Priestly, and no surprise, she's still the best thing in the movie. Controlled, sharp, quietly terrifying that hasn't gone anywhere. What has gone missing is the writing to back her up. The first film let her coldness hide something more fragile underneath, a real sense of what she'd sacrificed to get where she was. This time she mostly just repeats her greatest hits the same iciness, the same one-liners — until she starts to feel less like a person and more like a mascot for the franchise.



Anne Hathaway coming back as Andy Sachs is where things really stumble. Her whole arc feels like déjà vu. She spent the first movie learning the hard way about ambition and compromise, and here the story just... puts her back in almost the same spot, without much of an excuse for why. It cheapens everything she went through the first time around. Instead of pushing her somewhere new, the movie just walks her in a circle, and after a while that gets genuinely irritating.


Emily Blunt, as Emily Charlton, probably gets the best material in the whole thing. Her climb through the luxury world tracks, and the extra bite in her personality feels like something she actually earned. She's the one who consistently brings energy the movie badly needs. Even so, her storyline gets shortchanged there's clearly some old resentment and unfinished business between her and Andy simmering under the surface, and the film just never digs into it.


Stanley Tucci is as fun to watch as ever playing Nigel, but he's given less to do this time. Mostly he's there to hold things together emotionally, bouncing between characters and dropping wisdom on cue. He brings warmth wherever he shows up, sure, but that also makes it obvious how little the script is willing to risk elsewhere. Nigel's better than being everyone else's emotional connective tissue.


Pacing is one of the film's bigger weaknesses. It runs close to two hours and feels every minute of it. A lot of scenes exist purely to make longtime fans go "oh, I remember that" callbacks, repeated lines, mirrored setups. Cute in the moment, maybe, but they drag the story down. The movie spends way too much energy reminding you why you liked the first one instead of giving you a reason to care about this one.

Visually it's polished, sure, but forgettable in a way the original never was. Part of what made the first film sing was how the fashion actually told the story here, the clothes and the emotional stakes barely talk to each other. Everything looks expensive, everything's on-trend, but none of it reveals anything about the people wearing it. For a franchise built entirely around fashion as a kind of language, that's a strange thing to lose.


Maybe the most disappointing part is just how safe everything feels. The original wasn't afraid to let Andy be unlikeable, to sit with how messy ambition actually is. This one flinches from that discomfort at every turn. Characters make hard choices, sure, but the consequences get smoothed over almost immediately. Conflicts wrap up too neatly. Betrayals don't really sting.


The dialogue still has flashes of wit, but it's lost its edge. Miranda's put-downs are rarer and less quotable than they used to be. The script tries to freshen up its humor with jokes about social media and influencer culture, and some of those already feel stale like the movie's straining to sound current instead of actually being current.


The emotional center of the film suffers too, because the relationships just aren't as textured as they used to be. Andy and Miranda used to have this strange, charged bond admiration, fear, disappointment, all tangled together. Now it just feels transactional. The tension's technically there, but it's missing the unpredictability that made their scenes crackle the first time.


To its credit, the film does capture something true about the exhaustion of staying relevant in an industry that demands constant reinvention. There's real sadness underneath Miranda's power this time around, and honestly, that could've been the strongest thread in the whole movie. Instead it stays mostly in the background the film gestures at aging and obsolescence without ever being brave enough to really sit with either one.

Reviews so far have been split down similar lines. Plenty of critics are giving the performances credit, Streep especially, but plenty more are asking whether the movie really needed to exist. Early word points to something respectable but uneven a movie that entertains without cutting nearly as deep as the first one did.


At the end of the day, The Devil Wears Prada 2 isn't a bad movie so much as an unnecessary one. It gets what people loved about these characters but can't come up with a real reason to bring them back. It's fun in stretches, mostly when the cast gets to lean on their old chemistry, but it never gets close to the emotional or cultural precision of the original. Kind of like an expensive outfit you've already worn once — still looks fine, but the magic's gone.



*

Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post